Explain why ssds often use an fcfs disk-scheduling algorithm?

AffiliatePal is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.



SSDs (Solid State Drives) are a popular storage technology due to their high performance and reliability. When it comes to disk-scheduling algorithms, SSDs often use the FCFS (First-Come, First-Served) algorithm. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this preference and why FCFS is a suitable choice for SSDs.

Understanding Disk-Scheduling Algorithms

Before delving into why SSDs use the FCFS algorithm, it is essential to understand what disk-scheduling algorithms are and their significance in storage systems. Disk-scheduling algorithms determine the order in which read and write requests are serviced by the storage device. These algorithms play a crucial role in optimizing the performance and efficiency of storage systems.

Advantages of FCFS for SSDs

1. Simplicity: One of the primary reasons why SSDs often use the FCFS algorithm is its simplicity. FCFS operates on a straightforward principle: the requests are serviced in the order they arrive. This simplicity makes it easier to implement and manage, especially in SSDs, which have a different internal architecture compared to traditional hard disk drives (HDDs).

2. Low Overhead: FCFS has minimal overhead in terms of computational complexity. Since it does not involve complex calculations or heuristics, it requires fewer system resources to operate. This is particularly advantageous for SSDs, which aim to maximize performance and minimize latency.

3. Fairness: The FCFS algorithm ensures fairness in servicing read and write requests. It follows a strict first-come, first-served order, which means that no request is prioritized over another based on any criteria. This fairness ensures that all requests are treated equally, preventing any particular request from being delayed indefinitely.

4. Sequential Access Optimization: SSDs excel in handling sequential access patterns due to their lack of mechanical components. FCFS can effectively exploit this characteristic by serving requests in the order they are received. By maintaining a sequential order, FCFS allows for efficient data transfer and reduces the seek time, resulting in improved overall performance for SSDs.

Considerations for FCFS in SSDs

While FCFS is a suitable choice for SSDs, it is important to note a few considerations:

1. Lack of Optimization for Random Access: FCFS does not prioritize random access patterns, which can be a limitation for SSDs. Random access requests may experience higher latency compared to sequential access requests due to the lack of optimization in the FCFS algorithm. However, the overall performance benefits of FCFS often outweigh this limitation.

2. Potential for Starvation: FCFS may suffer from the issue of starvation, where certain requests may be delayed indefinitely if a continuous stream of new requests keeps arriving. This can impact the overall performance and fairness of the system. However, proper system design and implementation can mitigate this issue to a great extent.


In conclusion, SSDs often use the FCFS disk-scheduling algorithm due to its simplicity, low overhead, fairness, and optimization for sequential access patterns. While FCFS may have limitations in handling random access and potential for starvation, these drawbacks can be managed through proper system design. Overall, FCFS proves to be a suitable choice for SSDs, contributing to their high performance and reliability.


– https://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-hard-disk-drive-technologies/solid-state-drives-ssds-an-overview
– https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352711019300810
– https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9172497